Various Dates / Various Authors / Quora - Many view military service in the US Military from a personal perspective outside the official narrative of military recruiters and U.S. Government agencies that carry the official line as is demanded of them. A basic question of why American citizen's should not join the military, and why, is not an often offered as a subject for a public discussion as one might expect. Reasons an American citizen might choose not to join the military, and the lack of widespread public discussion on these points, involve a mix of practical, personal, ethical, and cultural factors as well. Though the NNOMY website does not republish discussions from public forums online, we make an exception to the question, "Are there any reasons why an American citizen shouldn't join the military" and listen to the perspectives of people with opinions and even experience on the question courtesy of the Quora Online Forum.

This report was first instigated by the content of X Rubicon and the process by which young people, especially men, are drawn into systems of war pride and violence, indoctrinated at pre-adult age before mental and moral breaking systems are fully developed and engaged.

  español - 

November 7, 2025 / Sean Griobhtha / Crossing Rubicons / Op-ed - This report was first instigated by the content of X Rubicon and the process by which young people, especially men, are drawn into systems of war pride and violence, indoctrinated at pre-adult age before mental and moral breaking systems are fully developed and engaged.

The obfuscation that war and the military are a personal opportunity for learning and professional advancement is a longstanding valuable propaganda method, not just for military recruitment, but for the corporate ideology that demands the availability of the standing violent force. Just as the military has spent years and mountains of money in psychological studies to “improve” rate and accuracy of fire in combat, in essence suppression of human natural tendencies, with applicability regardless of all circumstances, instigations, and motivations for war and killing; so the military, with corporate assistance, has spent the same time, energy. and capital in the same field with the addition of entertainment to present the military as a justifiable alternative to the harsh nature of capitalistic society — a “brotherhood of warriors” with food and bed versus the “dog eat dog” civilian society. All this boils down to manipulation, primarily of economically disadvantaged young men.

  español  -

Looking back: The Resolution Sparks a Movement

In 2003, the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) adopted a bold resolution to protect student privacy and resist military recruitment in public schools. What began as a local stand against the encroachment of the No Child Left Behind Act’s Section 9528—granting military recruiters access to student data—evolved into a two-decade movement that reshaped youth activism, policy, and public consciousness.

Amid growing opposition to the Iraq War, San Francisco passed a landmark resolution declaring the city a “Military Recruitment-Free Zone.” This symbolic stance aligned with its broader identity as a sanctuary city and peace-oriented municipality.

On January 14, 2003, SFUSD passed Resolution 212-10A15, affirming students’ and parents’ rights to opt out of military data sharing. The resolution mandated resource packets on alternatives to military service, featuring groups like CCCO, AFSC, and the National Lawyers Guild. It required opt-out cards for all high school students and classroom discussions on privacy and militarism. This policy, introduced on UN Human Rights Day, was a direct response to the Bush-era militarization of education and the $2.4 billion recruitment budget targeting youth.

  español - 

January 14, 2020 / Jacqueline Luqman / The Real News Network - Last week and this, Black Twitter was aflood with funny memes that seem to make light about how black people aren’t included in the “We’re going to war with Iran” sentiment because the push for this war wasn’t about black people or what black people wanted. But all jokes aside, are black and Latino and native and poor white people really sitting on the sidelines of America’s military actions, or are they more involved in them than they realize or would even like to be?

Here to talk about all the ways that black people, brown people, and poor people actually are the people most targeted by military recruiters, which puts them right in the cross hairs of military action, is Erica Caines. Erica is a local organizer in Baltimore and is the founder of Liberation Through Reading. You can find that on #liberationthroughreading on Twitter. Erica, thank you so much for joining.

  español | Deutsch | Français | English  - 

May 1, 2008 / War Resisters' International - With a seemingly endless war on terrorism gnawing away at the possibility for a lasting peace many activists in the United States are finding that they are drawn to a form of activism that deals with the relationship that young people have to militarism. The work is called, counter military recruitment or counter-recruitment for short, and it primary focus is to demilitarise a nation by attempting to first demilitarise the minds of its youth.

Often maligned and misunderstood by those outside of the peace & justice movement counter-recruitment has a roughly thirty year history which began shortly after the end of the US involvement in Vietnam which led to the suspension of the military draft. The ending of the draft meant that the military needed to adapt in order to recruit people into the “all volunteer” service and this heralded in the wide variety of incentives and recruitment tactics used to entice people to enlist. Many of these are still in use to this day and the primary concern with military recruitment is that young people aren’t getting all the information they need from military recruiters to make an informed decision about enlisting. While it may seem difficult to comprehend that young people in the US are able to be deceived by military recruiters, the reality is that militarism is that which can cloud the minds of masses. In this respect, many young people never question the sales pitch the men and women in uniform use to recruit them.

Knowing that militarism is the leverage used to sell the military, counter military recruitment is a direct response which counters the perceptions of the military as a sacred cow, or a pillar of our society, and that which keeps us free. Counter recruitment activists often work behind the scenes to change school policies on military recruiter access to young people rather than holding high profile campaigns and demonstrations. The core message associated with counter-recruitment is that one should be able to make an informed decision especially if it is a life altering decision that they are bound to for eight years of their life. Thousands of people and hundreds of groups are now engaged in this work, but a quick look at the past reveals that this was not the case thirty years ago.