español -
Looking back: The Resolution Sparks a Movement
In 2003, the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) adopted a bold resolution to protect student privacy and resist military recruitment in public schools. What began as a local stand against the encroachment of the No Child Left Behind Act’s Section 9528—granting military recruiters access to student data—evolved into a two-decade movement that reshaped youth activism, policy, and public consciousness.
Amid growing opposition to the Iraq War, San Francisco passed a landmark resolution declaring the city a “Military Recruitment-Free Zone.” This symbolic stance aligned with its broader identity as a sanctuary city and peace-oriented municipality.
On January 14, 2003, SFUSD passed Resolution 212-10A15, affirming students’ and parents’ rights to opt out of military data sharing. The resolution mandated resource packets on alternatives to military service, featuring groups like CCCO, AFSC, and the National Lawyers Guild. It required opt-out cards for all high school students and classroom discussions on privacy and militarism. This policy, introduced on UN Human Rights Day, was a direct response to the Bush-era militarization of education and the $2.4 billion recruitment budget targeting youth.
San Francisco’s counter-recruitment movement is notable for its intersectional framing—linking militarism to race, class, gender, and education. It pioneered youth-led organizing models that have been replicated in cities like San Diego, Los Angeles, Oakland, Chicago, and New York. The city’s stance helped catalyze national conversations about the ethics of military recruitment in public schools and the role of local governments in resisting federal militarism.
While SFUSD’s 2003 resolution didn’t trigger a direct legal battle with the DoD, it was part of a broader national resistance to military recruitment in schools that did provoke a federal response. The most notable pushback came through the Solomon Amendment, which allowed the federal government to withhold funding from educational institutions that denied military recruiters equal access to students — a powerful tool used to pressure compliance. The Solomon Amendment, passed in 1996 and expanded post-9/11, was the DoD’s primary mechanism to counter local resistance. It tied federal education funding to recruiter access, forcing schools to choose between upholding privacy and anti-discrimination policies or losing critical financial support.
San Francisco Unified School District Recruiters Policy
Adopted, in Substitute as Amended, by the Board of Education at its Regular Meeting of January 14, 2003
Subject: Resolution 212-10A15 Student/Parent Privacy [Introduced on 12/10/02 United Nations' Human Rights Day] - Commissioners Eric Mar, Mark Sanchez, Eddie Y. Chin, Emilio B. Cruz, Dan Kelly, Sarah Lipson, and Jill Wynns
WHEREAS: Soul music legend Curtis Mayfield said: "We got to have peace To keep the world alive and war to cease. We got to have joy To win our hearts with strength (they) can't destroy. People hear us, Through our voice the world knows there's no choice. Save the children…Peace, Peace, Peace!" and
WHEREAS: Despite a longstanding SFUSD policy barring U.S. military recruiters from our schools (Resolution No. 11-22A3 Military Recruitment), students are now vulnerable to the U.S. military's $2.4 billion [FY 2002] recruiting efforts and the military's new "open door" access to student names, addresses and telephone listings based on changes in the 2001 No Child Left Behind law; and
WHEREAS: Article I, Section 1 of the California Constitution recognizes and protects the individual right of privacy; and
WHEREAS: It is essential that parents and students of the district be well-informed of their rights to privacy from military recruiters, in addition to information about the practices of military recruiters and student alternatives to military.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District , in conjunction with community based groups, counselors, and educators, develop a packet of community resources for every secondary school site with information for parents and students on their rights to privacy from military recruiters and information about the practices of military recruiters and student alternatives to military service, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: In accordance with Section 9528 of the No Child Left Behind Act, SFUSD is notifying parents and students of their rights to request that the individual student's name, address and telephone listing not be released without prior written parental consent and that the district comply with each parental or student request for non-release of student information, and
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED: That the SFUSD provide at each high school information about alternatives to the military resources such as the Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors (CCCO) Military Out of our Schools Program [www.objector.org ], the National Lawyers Guild's Military Law Task Force [www.nlg.org], and the American Friends Service Committee's Youth & Militarism Program [www.afsc.org/youthmil.htm]; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That information about this privacy policy be presented and discussed in all high school homerooms in the first week of each school semester; and
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of Education directs the Superintendent and staff to develop an opt-out/opt-in card to be signed by and included in the personnel files of all high school students; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Board of Education requires such a signed card be required from all students as part of their high school registration.
1/14/03
Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20030418104721/http://www.rcnv.org/rcnv/archives/2003/sfcounterrecruit.htm (archive)
Nationally, local educators, veterans, and youth advocates began organizing workshops and teach-ins to counter military recruitment in public schools, especially targeting JROTC programs and ASVAB testing. In 2006, the San Francisco Board of Education voted to phase out JROTC programs, citing concerns over militarism and LGBTQ+ discrimination within the military. This sparked intense public debate and national media coverage.
Youth organizations like BAY-Peace and AFSC’s 67 Sueños amplified counter-recruitment efforts through art, street theater, and school-based organizing. Their work reframed military recruitment as a racial and economic justice issue.
Legal Pushback: Rumsfeld v. FAIR
Although not directly involving SFUSD, the 2006 Supreme Court case Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (FAIR) reflected the DoD’s aggressive defense of recruiter access. Law schools objected to military recruitment due to the discriminatory “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. The DoD interpreted the Solomon Amendment to require equal access for military recruiters, and Congress codified this interpretation to solidify its authority. The Supreme Court upheld the Solomon Amendment, ruling that withholding funds was constitutional, even if schools felt it violated their free speech or association rights.
Strategic Education and Data-Driven Advocacy
Counter-recruitment groups began producing infographics, zines, and curriculum guides to educate students and families about enlistment risks, alternatives, and the political economy of war. San Francisco activists collaborated with national networks like the National Network Opposing the Militarization of Youth (NNOMY) to track recruitment patterns, map military presence in schools, and advocate for policy changes at the district and state levels.
Surveillance, Resistance, and Digital Organizing
With the rise of predictive policing and data-sharing between schools and military recruiters, San Francisco organizers pushed for student data privacy protections and transparency in ASVAB testing practices. In 2020 COVID-19 disrupted in-person organizing, but groups pivoted to online workshops, digital storytelling, and virtual youth summits to maintain momentum.
Amid national debates over police militarization and youth civic engagement, San Francisco’s legacy resurfaced in campaigns to demilitarize school safety programs and expand restorative justice initiatives.
Strategic Implications for SFUSD and Allies
In 2022, SFUSD embedded counter-recruitment education into its Ethnic Studies curriculum, making it a graduation requirement. AI tools were introduced to help students analyze military marketing and simulate alternative futures. By 2025, San Francisco’s model influenced international efforts, with cities in Canada, Germany, and Chile adopting similar youth protection policies. Legacy and Impact from a single resolution in 2003, San Francisco’s counter-recruitment policy became a blueprint for resistance. It empowered generations of students to question militarism, assert their rights, and imagine futures rooted in peace and justice. Counter-recruitment reframed within broader campaigns to demilitarize school safety and expand restorative justice.
Topics for further Investigation:
📰 News & Media Coverage
- San Francisco Chronicle and Bay Area Reporter: Coverage of JROTC debates, Board of Education votes, and youth protests.
- Democracy Now! and Common Dreams: National reporting on counter-recruitment and youth-led anti-war activism.
🏛️ Government & Education Records
- San Francisco Board of Education meeting minutes (2006–2009): Votes and public commentary on JROTC phase-out.
- City of San Francisco Resolutions Archive: 2003 declaration of a “Military Recruitment-Free Zone.”
📚 Advocacy & Research Publications
- NNOMY (National Network Opposing the Militarization of Youth): Reports, infographics, and campaign documentation.
- AFSC (American Friends Service Committee): Youth programs like 67 Sueños and counter-recruitment toolkits.
- Project YANO (Youth and Non-Military Opportunities): Educational materials and data on recruitment practices.
🎨 Youth-Led Media & Art
- BAY-Peace: Zines, videos, and performance art challenging militarism.
- 67 Sueños: Visual storytelling and bilingual outreach on youth empowerment.
🧠 Academic & Policy Analysis
- Scholarly articles on militarization in education, such as:
- “Militarizing Youth in Public Schools” (Journal of Education Policy)
- “Counter-Recruitment and the Politics of Resistance” (Peace Review)
- What should I know about SFUSD's Ethnic Studies Class? (SFUSD)
Please consider supporting The National Network Opposing the Militarization of Youth
and our work to demilitarize our schools and youth by sending a check to our fiscal sponsor "in our name" at the
Alliance for Global Justice.
Donate Here
###
Updated on 11/01/2025 - GDG
